![Seminar Paper Review Template](https://writelatex.s3.amazonaws.com/published_ver/14327.jpeg?X-Amz-Expires=14400&X-Amz-Date=20240704T113005Z&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIAWJBOALPNFPV7PVH5/20240704/us-east-1/s3/aws4_request&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Signature=df5163e9cf028d439a34a8625307817a73457ab6fc8c8cec2c05aa4d0fffc0c7)
Seminar Paper Review Template
Author
Jean-Luc Lugrin
Last Updated
před 4 lety
License
Creative Commons CC BY 4.0
Abstract
Template for Paper Review
![Seminar Paper Review Template](https://writelatex.s3.amazonaws.com/published_ver/14327.jpeg?X-Amz-Expires=14400&X-Amz-Date=20240704T113005Z&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIAWJBOALPNFPV7PVH5/20240704/us-east-1/s3/aws4_request&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Signature=df5163e9cf028d439a34a8625307817a73457ab6fc8c8cec2c05aa4d0fffc0c7)
Template for Paper Review
\title{ATMCS Review Template}
\author{
Reviewer Name and Student ID \\
Paper
}
\date{\today}
\documentclass[12pt]{article}
\usepackage{enumitem,amssymb}
\newlist{todolist}{itemize}{2}
\setlist[todolist]{label=$\square$}
\usepackage{pifont}
\newcommand{\cmark}{\ding{51}}%
\newcommand{\xmark}{\ding{55}}%
\newcommand{\done}{\rlap{$\square$}{\raisebox{2pt}{\large\hspace{1pt}\cmark}}%
\hspace{-2.5pt}}
\newcommand{\wontfix}{\rlap{$\square$}{\large\hspace{1pt}\xmark}}
\begin{document}
\maketitle
\section{Review}
\emph{Write here}
A better paper was written by ~\cite{Hoang:2017:ASP:3025453.3025860}
\section{Comments to Committee }
\emph{Write here} (Hidden from authors)
\section{Recommendation}
\begin{todolist}
\item[\done] Strong Accept: I would argue strongly for accepting this paper; 5.0
\item Between possibly accept and strong accept; 4.5
\item Possibly Accept: I would argue for accepting this paper; 4.0
\item Between neutral and possibly accept; 3.5
\item Neutral: I am unable to argue for accepting or rejecting this paper; 3.0
\item Between possibly reject and neutral; 2.5
\item Possibly Reject: The submission is weak and probably shouldn't be accepted, but there is some chance it should get in; 2.0
\item Between reject and possibly reject; 1.5
\item Reject: I would argue for rejecting this paper; 1.0
\end{todolist}
\section{Expertise}
Provide your expertise in the topic area of this paper.
\begin{todolist}
\item[\done] Expert
\item Knowledgeable
\item Passing Knowledge
\item No Knowledge
\end{todolist}
\bibliographystyle{abbrv}
\bibliography{reviewer-bibliography}
\end{document}