\documentclass[letterpaper,12pt]{article}
\usepackage[margin=1.0in]{geometry}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage[english]{babel}
\usepackage{tcolorbox}
\usepackage{xcolor}
\usepackage{sectsty}
\definecolor{MyBlue}{rgb}{0.2,0.2,0.6}
%Colors can be specified using RGB values
\sectionfont{\color{MyBlue}}
\subsectionfont{\color{MyBlue}}
%Numerical citations in brackets
\usepackage[square,numbers]{natbib}
%Author-year citations in parenthesis
%\usepackage[round,authoryear]{natbib}
%Numerical citations with superscripts
%\usepackage[super]{natbib}
%List of natbib options
%============================================
%round (default) for round parentheses;
%square for square brackets;
%curly for curly braces;
%angle for angle brackets;
%semicolon (default) to separate multiple citations with semi-colons;
%colon the same as semicolon, an earlier mistake in terminology;
%comma to use commas as separators;
%authoryear (default) for author–year citations;
%numbers for numerical citations;
%super for superscripted numerical citations, as in Nature;
%sort orders multiple citations into the sequence in which they appear in the list of references;
%Creating different types of in-line citations in natbib
%\citet{} Textual citation
%\citep{} Parenthetical citation
%\citet*{} Same as \citet but if there are several authors, all names are printed
%\citep*{} The same as \citep but if there are several authors, all names are printed
%\citeauthor{} Prints only the name of the authors(s)
%\citeyear{} Prints only the year of the publication.
%More Info at Natbib
%=====================================================
%https://ctan.org/pkg/natbib
\begin{document}
%\bibliographystyle{abbrvnat}
\bibliographystyle{abbrvnat}
\begin{tcolorbox}[fonttitle=\sffamily\bfseries,title=Proposal Submission to the UCI Undergraduate Research Opportunities Program,collower=white,colback=MyBlue!50,colframe=MyBlue]
\noindent \textbf{Student Researcher} \hfill \textbf{Faculty Advisor}
\tcblower
\textbf{Peter Anteater} \hfill \textbf{Prof. V. Smart} \\
Department of X Engineering \hfill Department of X Engineering\\
\texttt{peter@uci.edu} \hfill \texttt{vsmart@uci.edu}
\begin{center}
\textsl{\Large $<$ Proposal Title $>$} \\
%\textsl{Proposal Submission to the UCI Undergraduate Research Opportunities Program}
\end{center}
\end{tcolorbox}
\section{Motivation}
The document is a template for students to use in preparing a UROP research proposal. This template uses \LaTeX, and it can be used in the Overleaf typesetting environment.
Use this section to make a persuasive case for the important problem that will be addressed in this project. Alternatively, the narrative can make a case for a gap in existing knowledge and/or the the potential and opportunity to advance cutting edge tools.
This section should include citations to previous work demonstrating that the proposed project is framed by existing knowledge. Some students may wish to dedicate a subsection to a literature review that frames the research question/topic.
Here are examples of two commonly used citation styles.
\begin{itemize}
\item The parenthetical style. Matching with a mentor requires consideration of a number of different factors \citep{crone2020introduction}.
\item \citet{crone2020introduction} describes a number of factors to consider when matching with a research mentor.
\item \citet{moftakhari2017compounding} reports on compound flood hazards from river floods and rising sea level.
\end{itemize}
Note that this template can be adjusted so citations appear in either author-year format, numerical format, or superscript format.
\subsection{Research Objectives}
Persuasive writing often relies on a distinct writing structure to set apart a key idea such as the proposed research objectives. In this case, use of a subsection is suggested as a way to focus the reader and gather his or her attention on this very important information. Alternatively, writers may wish to set apart their research objectives \textsl{with a distinct writing such as a slanted font} or alternatively \textbf{use of a bold font} or possibly \underline{use of underlined text} or even \textbf{\textit{a combination of bold and italicized text}}.
\section{Research Plan}
This section is used to describe how the proposed research will be carried out. Researchers commonly divide up their projects into a set of Tasks, and explain the methods that will be used in each task.
\subsection{Task 1: Data Collection}
Describe task 1 and how it will be completed.
\subsection{Task 2: Analysis and Modeling}
Describe task 2 and how it will be completed.
\vspace{1 em}
For the sake of providing useful examples for preparing technical documents in \LaTeX, Figure \ref{fig:uroplogo} presents an example of a figure embedded in a proposal and Table \ref{tab:points} presents an example of a table embedded in a proposal.
\begin{figure}[ht]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=2.0 in]{uropgraphic.png}
\caption{Undergraduate Research Opportunities Program}
\label{fig:uroplogo}
\end{figure}
\begin{table}[ht]
\centering
\begin{tabular}{l|cc}
& $x$ & $y$ \\ \hline
Point 1 & 1.0 & 1.0 \\
Point 2 & 1.5 & 0.5
\end{tabular}
\caption{Coordinates of points.}
\label{tab:points}
\end{table}
\section{Project Management}
Use this space to describe how the project will be managed, including plans to hold regular meetings or attend research group meetings where an update can be shared and feedback can be provided by other group members. Focus on the describing the responsibility of the undergraduate student researcher and the commitment demonstrated by the faculty advisor and associated research lab.
A Gantt chart is suggested showing the tasks of the project and the progression of activity by month or academic quarter. Here is an example of a Gantt chart that was prepared in a spreadsheet (MS Excel) and saved as a graphic file (*.png) that was uploaded to Overleaf.
\begin{figure}[h]
\centering
\includegraphics[width = 5.5 in]{ganttchart.png}
\caption{Project schedule. Note the inconsistency here in name (Table 1 vs. Figure \ref{fig:schedule}.) This would need to be resolved in a proposal submission.}
\label{fig:schedule}
\end{figure}
\section{Expected Outcomes}
This section is optional. If space allows, it gives the proposer the opportunity to make a brief compelling statement about the likely benefits of the proposed project. The National Science Foundation, the federal agency where many faculty submit proposals for research funding, requires that two specific outcomes be explained:
\begin{enumerate}
\item Intellectual Merit. This is the new knowledge that is expected to be produced by this work.
\item Broader Impact. These are the societal impacts that are likely to result from the project. Examples include educational experiences for students, increased diversity, expanded professional networks, outreach to high school students and importantly - aspects of the project that may have direct societal value such as discovery of a new source of energy that would allow for massive reductions in green house gas emissions.
\end{enumerate}
The UROP program does not require a section such as this, but it is not a bad idea for undergraduates to contemplate and report what they think will likely be accomplished by this project.
\section{Budget}
If funds are being requested, use this section to list out specific costs and provide a budget justifcation in a narrative form. UROP typically provides support in the \$250-1000 range although larger budgets may be possible in summer.
\bibliography{mybibliography}
\end{document}
