Here we provide a selection of academic journal templates for articles and papers which automatically format your manuscripts in the style required for submission to that journal. Thanks to the partnerships we're building within the publishing community, you can also now submit your paper directly to a number of journals and other editorial and review services via the publish menu in the editor.
This template is derived from the GigaScience LaTeX template. The original template is now customised to GigaBytes requirement and can be used to submit Updates for GigaBytes. Overleaf and Oxford University Press (OUP) have created the initial template for authors submitting manuscripts to GigaScience.
This template allows authors to prepare and edit their manuscripts in the OUP 'contemporary' layout used by GigaBytes.
To begin writing, simply click the Open as Template button, above. Additional guidelines for preparing your submission are included within the template itself.
This is a basic journal article template which includes metadata fields for multiple authors, affiliations and keywords.
It is also set up to use the lineno package for line numbers; these can be turned on by adding the 'lineno' option to the documentclass command.
We revisit the results of the recent Reproducibility Project: Psychology by the Open Science Collaboration. We compute Bayes factors—a quantity that can be used to express comparative evidence for an hypothesis but also for the null hypothesis—for a large subset (N = 72) of the original papers and their corresponding replication attempts. In our computation, we take into account the likely scenario that publication bias had distorted the originally published results. Overall, 75% of studies gave qualitatively similar results in terms of the amount of evidence provided. However, the evidence was often weak (i.e., Bayes factor < 10). The majority of the studies (64%) did not provide strong evidence for either the null or the alternative hypothesis in either the original or the replication, and no replication attempts provided strong evidence in favor of the null. In all cases where the original paper provided strong evidence but the replication did not (15%), the sample size in the replication was smaller than the original. Where the replication provided strong evidence but the original did not (10%), the replication sample size was larger. We conclude that the apparent failure of the Reproducibility Project to replicate many target effects can be adequately explained by overestimation of effect sizes (or overestimation of evidence against the null hypothesis) due to small sample sizes and publication bias in the psychological literature. We further conclude that traditional sample sizes are insufficient and that a more widespread adoption of Bayesian methods is desirable.
This template shows how you can use the apa6 package to write a manuscript in the style of the sixth edition of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, which is widely used in the social sciences.
The template includes an example bibliography that shows how to automatically generate APA-style citations and bibliography entries. Please see the apa6 package documentation for more information.
This template contains instructions for authors planning to submit a paper to the Journal of Plasma Physics.
You can use it in Overleaf to write and collaborate online in LaTeX. Once your article is complete, you can submit directly to JPP using the ‘Submit to journal’ option in the Overleaf editor.
For more information on how to write in LaTeX using Overleaf, see this video tutorial, or contact the the journal for more information on submissions.